> Do Win95-formatted ZiP require FAT 32 to be read/written, if > formatted to a single 105 Mb partition? Depends on how it is formatted.... FAT32 is more efficient for smaller files since the clusters don't get as large as for FAT16... Support for FAT32 would however mean that you would have to replace all of TOS's filehandling routs not only directory reads (ie file searchs...) Regards Sven