RE: VFAT.XFS versus MagiC

[Julian Reschke-FJR010 <Julian_Reschke-FJR010@email.mot.com>]

Jo Even Skarstein wrote:

>...and Win95 doesn't seem to care at all about this, as VFAT-floppies
>that are written to by either TOS or DOS often are rejected. And why,
>WHY must Win95 always add VFAT-entries even if the floppy is formatted
>as a standard DOS-disk? Doesn't it know the difference between FAT and
>VFAT? It drives me mad sometimes as I often has to exchange data on
>floppies between Win95-boxes and my Falcon.

Because a FAT disk is identical to a VFAT disk without long file names.