[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: memory protection

To: MiNT Mailing List <mint@atari.archive.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: memory protection
From: Sven Karlsson <sven%merlin@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:41:21 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.3.96-MiNT.971117181914.295B-100000@tos>
References: <346D688E.CE2A45F1@it.lth.se> <Pine.MNT.3.96-MiNT.971117181914.295B-100000@tos>

>>>>> "Mario" == Mario Becroft <mb@tos.pl.net> writes:
    >> Have you tried 1.12.5 or 1.12.6?
    Mario> Yes, and I believe the problem was the same or similar.

Hmmm anyway that rules out me or Konrad goofing when adding/debugging
the VM extension. I also don't belive in the statement that MP is
limited to 28Meg although I admit that it was a long time since I
last looked at the mem prot sources.

Regards
 Sven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: memory protection
  - From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>

References:
- Re: memory protection
  - From: Sven Karlsson <sven@it.lth.se>
- Re: memory protection
  - From: Mario Becroft <mb@tos.pl.net>

Prev by Date: Any more XaAES or OaSiS Dev.?
Next by Date: Re: Any more XaAES or OaSiS Dev.?
Previous by thread: Re: memory protection
Next by thread: Re: memory protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread