Re: STinG and Mint => Privilege Violation (FWD)

[Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@piwo.bl.pg.gda.pl>]

Nothing to be called "insufficiency". If Peter Rottengarten is so clever
to point out MiNT innsuffiences, perhaps will be clever enough to fix
them.

OK, enough irony. I don't think its worth fixing (agreed, Jo) since MiNT
has already an excellent and dedicated TCP stack, with all sort of servers
(I had an occasion, btw. to remotely test Stings FTP server... it's very
lame). But I may be wrong with that.

Gtx,

Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail:draco@bl.pg.gda.pl
http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~conradus/

** Quem Iuppiter vult perdere, dementat prius.
*******************************************************
** Kogo Jowisz chce zgubic, temu wpierw rozum odbiera.
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Anthony Jacques wrote:

> 
> Hmm... how about someone fixes these "insufficiencies"? 
> 
> Anthony (who hasn't looked the reasons for the problem).
> 
> 
> This is from comp.sys.atari.programmer...
> =============== Start of forwarded message ===================
> 
> In article <6cafn0$l9g$1@news2.isdnet.net>,
>  res1@vcf-com.fr (Olivier Booklage) writes:
> 
> > For testing my WEB server sHTTPd with long filename, I have try to run STinG
> > with Mint, but all servers, clients and CPX run a privilege violation error!
> > I have try to set STING.PRG in global memory but nothing is better :(
> 
> Why don't you read the FAQ ? It's all explained there. Due to insufficiencies
> in MiNT, every AUTO program that bends system vectors needs to run *after*
> MiNT in the AUTO folder ! This holds for STinG too.
> 
> 
> Cheers  Peter
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Peter Rottengatter       perot@pallas.amp.uni-hannover.de
>                             http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~perot
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> =============== End of forwarded message ===================
> 
> 
>