Re: Memory protection

[Julian Reschke-FJR010 <Julian_Reschke-FJR010@email.mot.com>]

mb@tos.pl.net%INTERNET wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Julian Reschke-FJR010 wrote:
> 
> > Why don't you just set the program flags for the faulty programs?
> 
> Because you never know which programs will exhibit the problem until it's
> too late. And even if I did know, I would find it a nuisance to maintain
> the memory flags of the programs. It would be much easier if all the
> programs just worked. And if protecting only writes but not reads
> accomplished this, I would be quite happy, since I really have little use
> for the read protection. If it is made optional, then people who do
> require read and write protection can enable it if they want to.

So why don't you set the program flags on *all* programs?