[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies

To: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@mi.com.pl>
Subject: RE: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
From: "Petr Stehlik" <joy@sophics.zln.cz>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 13:49:03 +0100
Cc: "mint" <mint@fishpool.com>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902251709180.19980-100000@nidus.mi.com.pl>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

> No, I am asking why you resist to do the corner clock as ACC (or process)
> instead of using stuff that breaks the memory protection concepts.

Please tell me how DATE/TIME breaks the memory protection and why _CPU, _FPU
and other cookies do not break it.

Petr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
- RE: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@medicaldataservice.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: Syscall (was: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread