[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Syscall (was: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies)

To: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>
Subject: Re: Syscall (was: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 26 Feb 1999 10:55:16 +0100
Cc: Johan Klockars <rand@cd.chalmers.se>, mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 1999 17:54:57 +0100 (EET)"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902251725020.19980-100000@nidus.mi.com.pl>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl> writes:

|> Maybe I am missing something, but this made me think that the Motorolas
|> concept of a separate user and supervisor stack is a bit silly.

This is ridiculous.  Any sane OS has a separate stack for kernel
operation.  Just because MiNT is ill-designed doesn't make this silly.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de                      completely different"
schwab@gnu.org

References:
- Syscall (was: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies)
  - From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] Building Mintlibs
Next by Date: RE: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Previous by thread: Re: Syscall (was: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread