Re: [MiNT] 030-only binaries

[kellis <kellis@leading.net>]

On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:

> This reminds of the thread about FPU support from a while back.
> 
> Someone (myself and a few others) were suggesting that there should
> be two binaries in every archive:  
> 
> 1) 68000     plain-jane binary.
> 
> 2) 68020-40  with 68881 FPU enabled by default.
> 
> Many Falcon users complained that a Falcon is not factory-equiped 
> with an FPU and that bying one wasn't among their priorities.

Yes, 030 doesn't mean FPU automatically.
FPU should be optional. Same for 030 binary.
That's the whole point in having the src for people to play wth
options in the src to fit their system better. A standard version should
work on all system. Then if you want more. recompile it.

68000 is a minimum.
030 bin why not.
FPU bin, why not.

PINE 4.10 is retarded being compiled for FPU ;)