[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] update on my situation

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 03:25:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.HPP.3.91.990521022057.4523G-100000@csmd33>; from Frank Naumann on Fri, May 21, 1999 at 02:22:02AM +0200
Mail-followup-to: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
References: <19990521020621.F285@zowee.rz.uni-sb.de> <Pine.HPP.3.91.990521022057.4523G-100000@csmd33>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hi!

On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 02:22:02AM +0200, Frank Naumann wrote:
> > Frank, have you tested if the tools run under plain TOS?
> 
> No and they will not work under PlainTOS because the tools require Dlock().

Hm, makes bootstrapping difficult.  

> > I got messages like that too, but they occured depending on the hard disk
> > and not depending on Minix or MiNT version.
> 
> Do you mean bad blocks?

Probably.  But they hadn't been reported like that.  Most of the time
failures were reported for drive k:.  Interesting enough that drive k:
didn't exist then.  Now that I have a drive k: the messages disappeared.
;-)

Ciao

Guido
-- 
http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000
mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
  - From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
- Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.51
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] update on my situation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread