[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs

To: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 20 May 1999 10:50:35 +0200
Cc: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>, John Blakeley <john.blakeley@mon.bbc.co.uk>, mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: Michael Schwingen's message of "Tue, 18 May 1999 02:01:13 +0200"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905180802330.1772-100000@mon07261.mon.bbc.co.uk> <Pine.HPP.3.91.990518112017.2652D-100000@csmd33> <19990518020113.F285@tubul.dascon.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de> writes:

|> On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 11:32:45AM +0200, Frank Naumann wrote:
|> 
|> > it's possible). Work here ok. e2fsck will always detect if a partition 
|> > is clean or not and perform only a check if it's neccessary. Without 
|> > MinixFS partitions you can skip the /etc/fastboot mechanism and always 
|> > start e2fsck.
|> 
|> Cant such a real clean flag be implemented in MinixFS, too?

It is already, at least in Linux.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de                      completely different"
schwab@gnu.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
  - From: John Blakeley <john.blakeley@mon.bbc.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>
- Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
  - From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] where is MiNT list???
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Stability of mint ext2fs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread