[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC

To: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>, "MiNT mailing list" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: RE: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 08:09:05 +0200
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <19990604013413.C991@zowee.rz.uni-sb.de>
Reply-to: <reschke@muenster.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of Guido Flohr
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 1:34 AM
> To: MiNT mailing list
> Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
>
> ...
>
> > BTW: it should be possible to maintain a unique makefile for
> both compilers,
> > right?
>
> Better not.  PureC needs other files.

So? It's possible to handle that with gnu-make, isn't it?

In case this is not known: there is a "cc" frontend to the PureC commandline
version which is (almost) POSIX compliant.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
  - From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
  - From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] ifconfig fixed (please README)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread