RE: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>]

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of kellis
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 2:20 AM
> To: MiNT mailing list
> Subject: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
>
>
>
> Hello People.
>
> I would like to start this message to report that everythng works fine.
> Except the annoying ext2fs not seeing that it was unmounted (no big
> problem).
>
> My question was:
>
> I set (with mintsetter) the Secure level, up to 2.
>
> Then If I try to run the prog su, it will just crash.
>
> Now I understand that su is directly dealing with the security,
> however:
>
> Is there any su src or bin that would work with secure level at 2?

You could try my one (goto
http://www.muenster.de/~reschke/soft_e.html#minttool).

> Is this the expected behaviour of su to just crash?

Does it abort or does it crash? What version are you using? Do you have a
trace?

> Is it possible to run su with Secure level at 2? (as in, would it defeat
> the purpose of having Secure level).

I don't see why it shouldn't work.

> If to run su you need to go down to Secure level 1, does it make sense?
>
>
> PS: metados, SPIN, hddriver with scsi cdrom on a falcon ct2, works perfect
> with MiNT 1.15.1, Martin, I don't know what you are experiencing...
>
> Thanks
>
>
>