[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?

To: kellis <kellis@leading.net>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:51:38 +0200
Cc: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9906250011320.118-100000@tampa1-062.southeast.net>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hi Kellis!

> I set (with mintsetter) the Secure level, up to 2.

Secure Level 2 is not supported yet. All programs must be recompiled with
a recent MiNT-Lib version.

> Then If I try to run the prog su, it will just crash.

Are you sure that it crashes? I mean it's aborted by kernel as an
illegal system call (securelevel 2) was made.


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 040
--------------------------------------
Internet: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de
Mausnet:  Frank Naumann @ L2

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>

References:
- [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] an example of broken lib
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Reibl rc files enclosed
Previous by thread: RE: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread