Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b

[Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>]

On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 10:29:31AM +0100, Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no wrote:

> And why does this mean it's broken? I know you're a big fan of fstab Q-Funk,
> but I honestly can't see what the attraction is. fstab is old-fashioned,
> cumbersome, rigid and static, and inferior to the mechanism we already have
> in MiNT. What benefits are there in having fstab? What can be done with

Then tell me how MiNT handles running the correct fsck tool (in parallel on
multiple drives if possible), and keeps track of 'dump' information without
fstab?

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen