[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b

Hi Julian!

> Am I the only one who sees a problem in breaking existing code without a
> technical reason?
> Please explain why this concept *needs* to be changed, and then we can
> discuss it. Just because it's "sexy" to change the approach certainly is not
> a good idea.

I'm only interested why it's really neccessary (for existing code) that
every filesystem have a drive letter under U:?

>From the user point of view it's really not neccessary to know if
/foo/bar is another filesystem than /foo (because bar is mounted to
/foo/bar). It's task of the kernel to map all things correct so that it
looks as one filesystem for the user.


Internet: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de
Mausnet:  Frank Naumann @ L2