[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b

Am I the only one who sees a problem in breaking existing code without a
technical reason?

Please explain why this concept *needs* to be changed, and then we can
discuss it. Just because it's "sexy" to change the approach certainly is not
a good idea.

Julian F. Reschke (mailto:reschke@medicaldataservice.de)
MedicalData Service GmbH Münster, Germany

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:schwab@suse.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 2:34 PM
> To: reschke@muenster.de
> Cc: Frank Naumann; mint@fishpool.com
> Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b
> "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de> writes:
> |> df.ttp, backup programs, program installers, desktops, du.ttp, ...
> These are 'bout 15 of a cast of thousands.
> Andreas.
> --
> Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
> schwab@suse.de                                   completely different."
> SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg