[MiNT] What's in, what's out?

[Joerg_Westheide@su.maus.de (Jörg Westheide)]

Hi Guido!

GF>Take for example VM: It was implemented, it proved not to work, and it
GF>was removed then.
Tell me something about VM's API

GF>If there will really be another signal that would be desirable we can
GF>still redefine SIGPWR to SIGWHATEVER, unless SIGPWR is already widely
GF>used.  But if SIGPWR is used by then, there was obviously a need for
GF>it.
You know that this change will not happen then. One major argument will be
"it already assigned to SIGPWR"

Bye

                Joerg