RE: [MiNT] /proc

[Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:reschke@medicaldataservice.de]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 10:27 AM
> To: gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de; mint@gfanrend.fishpool.fi
> Subject: RE: [MiNT] /proc
> 
> Could you be a bit more specific in which ways your 
> implementation differs
> from MagiC's and/or from the one I have specified? Maybe it 

Speaking of SLBs, I intended to port a GEM-library I'm using (CGEM, hi
Mario!) to an SLB, but the lack of reentrant libs (GEM-lib, MiNT-lib)
stopped me. What does everybody do when they write SLBs? I guess it's
possible to use semaphors, but that will slow things down terribly.

I understand that you (Julian) have written a stdlib.slb for PureC, is this
released? I'm very interested in it, I don't need something as complex as
MiNT-lib for my current SLB-project.

> would be a good
> compromise to allow to pass a path list instead of a path, and have
> Slbopen() do the path search then (without having to access the
> environment).

Something like 'SLBPATH=....' in mint.cnf would suffice.

Jo Even Skarstein