[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] /proc



> > Could you be a bit more specific in which ways your
> > implementation differs
> > from MagiC's and/or from the one I have specified? Maybe it
>
> Speaking of SLBs, I intended to port a GEM-library I'm using (CGEM, hi
> Mario!) to an SLB, but the lack of reentrant libs (GEM-lib, MiNT-lib)
> stopped me. What does everybody do when they write SLBs? I guess it's
> possible to use semaphors, but that will slow things down terribly.

I would try to avoid it. "Just" make sure that you don't have *any* global
variables in the library, and put everything into something on the stack.

> I understand that you (Julian) have written a stdlib.slb for
> PureC, is this
> released? I'm very interested in it, I don't need something as complex as
> MiNT-lib for my current SLB-project.

No, it's not released as source. a) it's experimental, b) it relies on PureC
libraries, c) it uses some hacks. But if you have a specific question, I'm
happy to answer it if I can...