RE: [MiNT] /proc

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>]

> From: owner-mint@gfanrend.fishpool.fi
> [mailto:owner-mint@gfanrend.fishpool.fi]On Behalf Of Konrad M.
> Kokoszkiewicz
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 4:12 PM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de; mint@gfanrend.fishpool.fi
> Subject: RE: [MiNT] /proc
>
>
>
> > from MagiC's and/or from the one I have specified? Maybe it
> would be a good
> > compromise to allow to pass a path list instead of a path, and have
> > Slbopen() do the path search then (without having to access the
> > environment).
>
> Or accept SLBPATH as just a path to ONE directory which contains all SLB
> binaries (this it could be just pasted to the library pathname), instead
> of being a PATH-like string which is a list of folders to search through
> (such searching must have been done inside the kernel? in supervisor mode
> for SO LONG?)

As I said before, the disadvantage is that all this code needs to reside in
the statically bound part of the binary.