[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern

To: Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no
Subject: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:35:34 +0200
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: <5BE5F52778B0D2118688080009DCE90D376DB6@s2trheim.intra.gjensidige.no>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On 6.12.1999, Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no <Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige...:

> I can't speak for the rest of the community, but at least two
> of my own programs (Taskbar and Connexion(2)) depends on the
> *documented fact* that /proc is a 8+3 filesystem. 

Again, as I mentioned in the post you just answered, _where_
does it says _explicitely_ it must be 8+3?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin-Éric Racine            The Atari Stacy and TT030 Homepage
Lappeenranta, Finland          http://members.tripod.com/~TT030/
----------------------------------------------------------------
   "When the time comes, I will know and I shall be."  Q-Funk

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: atari@bright.net (Lonny Pursell)

References:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] New kernel features
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] New kernel features
Previous by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread