Re: [MiNT] minimal support base

[Andreas Dahlberg <zpq@shadowbbs.cx>]

On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:

> Recently, Konrad also asked wether we should continue adding more
> features and optimization options, despite the increased memory
> requirements, or if maybe it would be better to slip development
> into separate kernels for 68000 and 68k.
> 
> This leads to one question that hasn't been agreed before:
> What should our minimum support level be?  
> 
> 68030?  With or without assuming a 68881 FPU is present?
> Or more generic, like 68020-40, perhaps?

Separate kernels for 030 (and 040) seems to be more stable then the
68020-040 ones on my Falcon.

// ZPQ