[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] 1.15.7 beta

To: mintlist <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] 1.15.7 beta
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:23:11 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.10003020135520.161-100000@tmp1-055.fdn.com>; from kellis on Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:51:48AM +0000
Mail-followup-to: mintlist <mint@fishpool.com>
References: <Pine.MNT.4.10.10002291554560.125-100000@FreeMiNT.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <Pine.MNT.4.10.10003020135520.161-100000@tmp1-055.fdn.com>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:51:48AM +0000, kellis wrote:

> I say, until all major software which do NOT have replacement to work
> nicely with NEWFATFS, it should be optional. A list could be made. 

I would suggest we first check *why* these programs fail on a 8+3 FAT
partition using NEWFATFS - after all, there should not be much difference to
the TOSFS case.

If the problems can't be fixed, then I agree we still need TOSFS.

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

References:
- Re: [MiNT] 1.15.7 beta
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] new ircII and Pine
Next by Date: [MiNT] Re: Gfx programs (was: 1.15.7 beta)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] 1.15.7 beta
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] 1.15.7 beta
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread