[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] uname again...

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] uname again...
From: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:43:17 +0200
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

I thought this had been fixed and agreed, but apparently not...

Uname still returns "FreeMiNT", which prevents a package from
building, even though it has a target for "m68k-*-mint" and it
doesn't take arguments in "config" so...

Where in the kernel/mintlib source will I find the offending bit
that make uname return "FreeMiNT" for sysname?

Thanks.
-- 
Martin-Éric Racine  http://funkyware.atari.org/  Atari TT030 FAQ
Lappeenranta, Finland.  Surfing on a Intel/Microsoft-free GEM OS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] uname again...
  - From: Tomas Berndtsson <tomas@nocrew.org>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] maximum Mint-Net socket size
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] uname again...
Previous by thread: [MiNT] maximum Mint-Net socket size
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] uname again...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread