[MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension

[Joerg_Westheide@su.maus.de (Jörg Westheide)]

Hi Julian!

JR>However it has the drawback that for every process that accesses an
JR>SLB, the kernel needs to allocate additional memory.
Yes, but IMO that shouldn't be a problem as it's only a few bytes.
The drawback of Konrad's proposal is that SLBs which are not aware of his
extension will be executed with the overhead he wants to reduce. Not to
mention that his proposal creates two kinds of SLB, which is IMO unneccessary
and will tend to produce at least irritations

Bye

                Joerg