RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension (reposted)

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@medicaldataservice.de>]

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 5:55 PM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: MiNT mailing list
> Subject: RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension (reposted)
>
>
>
> > I was thinking of getting rid of the getpid option. If an SLB
> actually *is*
> > interested in the caller's PID, it can easily find it with the
> same GEMDOS
> > call that the dispatcher would need to do...
>
> Well, yes, sounds reasonable. So it would be only bit 0m which if set to
> 1, passes empty longword instead of the original argument.

OK, I'll put that into my SLBLOAD implementation / documentation and update
it soon...