[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@freemint.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 23:59:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <20000405235318.A16616@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hello!

> > Related to this: I don't see a lot of people using SLBs under MiNT if it
> > doesn't support SLBPATH to locate them.
> 
> I thought about this, and I still think it's broken-by-design to
> evaluate an environment variable inside a kernel call.

I agree, very bad design ... 


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
  - From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
  - From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread