Hi! On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 10:33:52PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > First of all, I am annoyed as much as you of Outlook's inability to do > proper quoting. However, I have my reasons to use it. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know Outlook even doesn't allow removing unnecessary ammounts of quoted text before sending a message ... > No to your *technical* comment: it might not be a call, but it *is* code > which resides within the kernel. And what does that change? It's still code run in user mode, so it can't ever have access to curproc, as that's supervisor-protected kernel memory, for good reasons. > Related to this: I don't see a lot of people using SLBs under MiNT if it > doesn't support SLBPATH to locate them. I thought about this, and I still think it's broken-by-design to evaluate an environment variable inside a kernel call. However, I'm going to implement it, but it's a bit tricky - parsing and checking for a file must not lead to buffer-overflows directly inside the kernel ... Ciao Thomas -- Thomas Binder (Gryf @ IRCNet) gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de PGP-key available on request! binder@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Attachment:
pgpPlFv25CWiR.pgp
Description: PGP signature