[MiNT] tosfs (read at your own risk)

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

Martin Eric,

first, your statement about "many GEM applications" using "pre-TOS 1.02
calls" because of what the newfatfs will fail, is pure rubbish and only
reveals how deep is your ignorance regarding system internals.  There
is nothing to "prove otherwise", this is obvious.

Second, if you first make a statement giving no arguments to prove it, and
then on a clear suggestion that the stamement made was a nonsense, you
postulate that the opponent has to prove that the nonsense you wrote was a
nonsense - then this is very interesting kind of logic. But anyways, yes,
i CAN prove you otherwise: namely, you are not able to list the "pre-TOS
1.02 calls" you mentioned, like Frank postulated, and this is enough.

Bye,

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail: draco@atari.org
http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.