Re: [MiNT] RPM --> cpio --> TGZ

[Katherine Ellis <kellis@fdn.com>]

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, [iso-8859-1] Martin-Éric Racine wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Katherine Ellis wrote:
> 
> > RPM is a good way to consolidate distributions, a coherant system.
> 
> Sorry, I beg to differ.  
> 
> Debian's way of handling dependancies, combined with a more
> accute auditing of each package before it is allowed to make it
> to the distribution, is simply _much_ better than RPM.
> 
> -- 

qfunk, I quote myself  "A good way", as in: opposed to tgz for most binary
packages.
I Didn't say the best, and who's right to say anyway that rpm < deb. I
personally don't care.
But you had to put your grain of salt in the irrelevant matter of the day.