[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Réf. : [MiNT] Compiling for 68000 useful ?
- To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
- Subject: Réf. : [MiNT] Compiling for 68000 useful ?
- From: Patrick PROKOPOWICZ <Patrick.Prokopowicz@edf.fr>
- Date: 17 Jan 2001 09:25:01 +0100
- Alternate-recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-recipients: Prohibited
- Original-encoded-information-types: (1)(0)(10021)(7)(1)(0)(1), (1)(0)(10021)(7)(1)(0)(6), (1)(0)(10021)(7)(1)(0)(100)
- Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
- X400-content-type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-mts-identifier: [/c=fr/admd=atlas/prmd=edfgdf/; 002493A6556DD068-EDFGDF]
- X400-originator: Patrick.Prokopowicz@edf.fr
- X400-received: by mta EDFGDF in /c=fr/admd=atlas/prmd=edfgdf/; Relayed; 17 Jan 2001 09:25:01 +0100
- X400-received: by /c=fr/admd=atlas/prmd=edfgdf/; Relayed; 17 Jan 2001 09:25:01 +0100
- X400-recipients: non-disclosure;
> Well, given the fact that Multitos was first shipped with Falcon, I
> do not think that
> Mint and utilities should be compiled for 68000, but for 68020 or more.
> If someone uses Mint on a 68000 machine and thinks it is great, so ok...
> So maybe we should compile software for 68030 (no-fpu) and m68020-60 (fpu).
> It is just a suggestion, does someone really use Mint on a pure ST ?
ST users are not alone to use MinT on 68000 !
I use MinT, a part on falcon, and a part on PC with TOSBOX, and actually, Atari émulators are only ST émulators...
So, I'm very happy to have a 68000 compiled version into MinT distribution.
A+
Patrick Prokopowicz