[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] Shared .so libs question.

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] Shared .so libs question.
From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:05:28 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <003c01c12faf$92258800$bc5bae3f@oemcomputer>
List-help: <mailto:listar@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Hi All!

I've been thinking about $subj for a while. I wander why the standard .so
library scheme is not present in MiNT. We have a virtual memory, memory
protection so why not to have a shared libraries?
Another thing is to implement them using .SLB framework which does work
well at the moment.
It would be nice if xclock binary won't have 1MB.

What are the issues to be done to be able to use .so libs?

regards

Stan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Shared .so libs question.
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT-Net under FreeMiNT 1.15.12 dials
  - From: "Brian J. Roland" <bjr@localink4.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT-Net under FreeMiNT 1.15.12 dials
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Shared .so libs question.
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT-Net under FreeMiNT 1.15.12 dials
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Shared .so libs question.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread