[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Problems with pppd 2.3.11
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Maurits van de Kamp wrote:
> > It worked, thanks very much (why TF it wasn't necessary with older
> > pppd?)
>
> It has always been necessary;it just sometimes accidentally works without,
> too. (I had the same experience in Linux).
>
> "noauth" means the *remote* doesn't have to authenticate to *you*. I don't
> think that was ever different. :)
IIRC "noauth" was the default behaviour in previous versions.
/*
** Jo Even Skarstein http://joska.nvg.org/
*/