[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
From: "Gildor" <gildor.i@seznam.cz>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:51:59 +0100
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B9E6B28D.A1B1%atari@q1.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Hi!

> Why the need for virtual memory, I thought the virtual atari with huge
> memories solved this?  I'm just curious.  I always thought virtual memory
> would knock performance down anyway.

Yes, virtual memory knock performance down, but with mi Falcon I realy need
it!
I'm also using aranym (where is no need for virtual memory), but I like real
hw.

> I would like to see a new official mint release though.  I've been using
1.16 and it works
> pretty darn good thus far.
>
Yes it work pretty god except spin.xdd bug, great work!

Gildor

References:
- [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
  - From: Lonny Pursell <atari@q1.net>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
Previous by thread: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] FW: Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread