[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-version of gcc)

To: MiNT Mailing List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-version of gcc)
From: Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarenskeen@zonnet.nl>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:51:58 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <1069627281.6766.38.camel@joy.home>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Is the difference between FreeMiNT 1.15.12 and 1.16a big enough to bump
the version number for a new release to 2.0 ? I would choose 1.2 as
version number for a new official release. Just a thought, I have no
intention to make a big issue out of this. ;-)

-- 

Martin Tarenskeen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-version of gcc)
  - From: Vadim Kindl <gildor.i@seznam.cz>

References:
- [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-version of gcc)
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] CDROM drivers, desktops
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Broker logger?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-versio
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] new FreeMiNT release (was Re: 030-version of gcc)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread