Hello!
Well, IMHO the newfatfs should be compatible (from the user/app
perspective) to the old TOSFS (not counting obvious bugs, of course).
So... users were used to that only a single filename extension is used
no matter what is behind. IMO the newfatfs should handle that the same
way.
Maybe you give an example what system calls are involved and which names
should be ignored/modified/specially handle in which way.
And in case there is a trailing '.' than it is the same as the same
filename without extension.
Yes, I bugfixed this.
Regards,
Frank
--
ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de