[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:35:48 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <40F24BA0.2040903@seznam.cz>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

> I believe that this private mail explanation brings more light to all...

Speaking of which, I believe my last reply was accidentally sent off-list
as well..  sorry to whoever got it :o)

> As / refer to the root of the current drive of the current application.

That's basically what I wrote too. :o) However, I'm wondering to what
extend the UNIXMODE is checked for this (rU is supposed to mean "drive U
is root").

Maurits.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

References:
- [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Previous by thread: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: Re: mint.cnf and sln?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread