Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)

["Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

> Actually I got sick and tired of this thread which has now taken the
> turn of me being called "obsessed" whereas all I did was state one little
> fact that happened to touch the shrine of Atari perfection, resulting
> in rediculous attacks that required some defending from my part.

There are better points to "touch the Atari perfection", than to question
the location of one Ctrl key and later fight for this point heroically
during three days, refusing to accept that there may be another point of
view.

> In this whole "discussion", there has been no reply that actually says
> anything against my original explanation about the ergonomics, there
> have just been sarcastic replies

Sarcastic replies were done, because of the weight you seem to attribute to
this question. *Apparently* the rest of the world does not treat this as so
deadly important, as you seem to do.

And since you finally give up the topic, I'll remark only this:

> Caps lock is a part of character input.

Nopes, CapsLock is a control key (the same class as: SHIFT, ALT, CTRL,
INSERT, CLRHOME and ALTGR).

> Because THAT is not a design flaw. Again you've proven my point.

You are right in one thing: you really, to use your own words, "lock
stupid".

--
CVV
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz, http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut seruit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur.
** Taka to juz natura pospólstwa, albo sluzalczo sie plaszczy,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy. (Liwiusz XXIV, 25).