[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] bash 3.0

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] bash 3.0
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:29:37 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <00cf01c47a19$b2feca70$0100a8c0@dalamar>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, [iso-8859-2] Adam K³obukowski wrote:

> Bash 3.0 has been released. Binary for FreeMiNT is about 40kb bigger then
> the previous version. Should we switch to 3.0 or stick to the old version?

Bash was already pretty memory hungry, so on 1MB systems (or 4MB with AES)
it was best avoided anyway, and for the higher end systems 40k shouldn't
be much of a problem..

Besides, isn't it up to the user what version to install? (I don't think
there's anything wrong with putting Bash 3.0 in by default).

Maurits.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] bash 3.0
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>

References:
- [MiNT] bash 3.0
  - From: Adam Kłobukowski <atari@gabo.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] bash 3.0
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] bash 3.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread