[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:20:42 +0200
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1118934446.15790.7.camel@linuxbox> <0007b541.01948d720389@smtp.t-online.de> <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

 Hello,

 Came to think of it .. what have you set your 'redraw_timeout' to? This
is a timeout value XaAES uses to allow for clients to service its
WM_REDRAWS. If all WM_REDRAWS are not serviced before this timeout, the
clients that are being marked as "lagging" will have its WM_REDRAW queue
reset and a full set of WM_REDRAWs are sent for each of its windows.
Perhaps this is what happens here? Try to enlarge this value (I use a
value of 2000 on the Milan, could be enough with 1000 on 060 Hades).


 Best regards,
Odd Skancke

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Erich Arning <Erich.Arning@t-online.de>
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread