[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:35:16 -0500
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1119028842.15790.29.camel@linuxbox>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1118934446.15790.7.camel@linuxbox> <0007b541.01948d720389@smtp.t-online.de> <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox> <1119028842.15790.29.camel@linuxbox>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 19:20 +0200, Odd Skancke wrote:
>  Came to think of it .. what have you set your 'redraw_timeout' to? This
> is a timeout value XaAES uses to allow for clients to service its
> WM_REDRAWS. If all WM_REDRAWS are not serviced before this timeout, the
> clients that are being marked as "lagging" will have its WM_REDRAW queue
> reset and a full set of WM_REDRAWs are sent for each of its windows.
> Perhaps this is what happens here? Try to enlarge this value (I use a
> value of 2000 on the Milan, could be enough with 1000 on 060 Hades).

So, slower applications get MORE redraw events?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Erich Arning <Erich.Arning@t-online.de>
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
- Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread