[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy?

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy?
From: "Joakim Högberg" <gokmase@home.se>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:27:21 +0200
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: gokmase@home.se
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

>And I got discuraged by folks who dont want anything >beyond n.aes
>because it breaks compatibility. There is no future.

Yes, there is a future! If we break N.AES-compatibility when surpassing N.AES in terms of performance and features, what are we missing out on? Old software will still work okay on N.AES and new software will run okay on XaAES (if we see to it!).

N.AES is discontinued whereas XaAES is still (very actively!) in development. And for free. Let's not forget that! Please don't get discouraged Odd, you have done a marvellous job with XaAES during the past year and I hope you'll keep it up for a long time to come!!!

Regards,

/Joakim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy?
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy? (was: Re: usage ofwind_calc())
Previous by thread: [MiNT] XaAES vs N.AES (was: Re: XAAES slow?)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] wind_get( WF_WORKXYWH) buggy?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread