[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode

To: Arnaud BERCEGEAY <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:47:52 -0500
Cc: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <op.stvb22k08yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1DseMz-0006y1-Kd@mother.fishpool.fi> <op.stu6ypvf8yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net> <1121284855.4207.99.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <op.stvb22k08yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 22:19 +0200, Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > OK - this is getting silly.  What dynamic libraries?
> 
> Don't lost the focus please. With static libraries the pb is still here.

I fail to see the problem at all for a properly written library.

My point was that if you are introducing new features like dynamic
libraries, which are a hack, how could you have a problem with something
thats at least implemented in the AES?   Its a double standard.

References:
- [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Joakim Högberg" <gokmase@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[3]: usage of wind_calc()
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK operating mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread