[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components



Quoting YesCREW <jvalant@atari.org>:
be forced to use Windom. I agree with them. Let the people (not involved in
Windom and etc..) show what they prefer. Personaly, AES API is the way, even
more, since libraries can still be used... If needed, u can branct to OzkAES
or whateve, or Evan can branch to EvanAES, but offers us a choice.. or we can
just all migrate to Windows...

There will never be an EvanAES branch. I've already made that perfectly clear.
I also said I'd be WCOWORK's major supporter if we could come up with an
agreement on the reasoning behind some implementation details.   These things
take awhile to get everyone on the same page.

I also believe there are plenty of other areas where the AES can be improved,
that simply can not or should not be implemented as a user-library.  There is
much to be done, WCOWORK or not, and as of my last email concerning WCOWORK ... I was under the impression that we were finally on the same page and I'd likely
be using it!

-- Evan