Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components

[Adam Kłobukowski <atari@gabo.pl>]

Odd Skancke napisał(a):
>  I have found out that there is no room for any further development of
> XaAES. Reason I say this is that every new development goes on outside
> the AES kernel, in the form of libs, etc. And when new features like
> WCOWORK cannot even see the light of day because "windom already have
> it", I no longer see the point. New features seems to belong in
> libraries. I dont agree, but I have to give in because if the last
> remaining scene wont use new feature, I dont wont to spend time
> developing them. The fun is gone.
> 
>  XaAES development is therefore not for me anymore as it is quite up to
> other AES's by now. All new development for our platform seems to be
> centered around libraries. It is clrearly stated above that new features
> will make XaAES 'a OS without applications', because the only library
> worth mentioning wont be supporting it. 
> 
>  Because of these reasons, because I had goals beyond making XaAES just
> another AES, I resign from XaAES development.

Bad, really bad news.

Please reconsier. Not everyone uses Windom.

Break the compatibility! Long live the revolution!

-- 
Semper Fidelis

Adam Klobukowski
atari@gabo.pl