[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:27:52 +0200
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F033F6A01@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>, mint@fishpool.com
References: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F033F6A01@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Hi!

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:10:05AM +0100, jan.thomas@bt.com wrote:
> > > Whats the benefit of MP anyway? [...] I cant use it on the CT60
> > 
> > Why not? I can.
>
> But then you have 1/2 the speed?

Haven't noticed such a big difference. Memory protection does cost
some performance, but not that bad.


Ciao

Thomas


-- 
Thomas Binder (Gryf @ IRCNet)
gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de
PGP-key available on request!

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
  - From: <jan.thomas@bt.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] binutils-2.13.2.1-2.m68kmint.rpm
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Atari 030 patch for mmu030.S in current CVS
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread