[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Supexec taking one VBL?
> What I had in mind was that if demo/game coders can agree that libSDL
> fulfills their needs then the SDL *API* could perhaps be made part of
> the OS so it'd have direct and fast access to hardware, while on
> singletasking system the normal libSDL would be used to deliver the same
> API for the programmer.
Yes but you still didn't explain how do you want to solve that handler
problem. You made API, kernel API, cool. But there's still userspace
application vs kernelspace VBL handler problem.
> Does it make sense? It's basically about making the libSDL a better
> FreeMINT XBIOS.
This is basically what I had in mind but see above.
--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org