Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2

[Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>]

On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 12:34 +0200, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> Miro Kropacek wrote:
> 
> > But this fact doesn't change anything on my hint to remove 
> > pml from compilation chain -- gcc is OK with its built-in stuff from 
> > mpfr (try to list libgcc.a with 'nm' -- a lot of math functions here), 
> > it needs libm / pml for nothing (tested -- I had no math lib installed 
> > during compilation).
> 
> Ok, I didn't understand... You said that no additional libm is required 
> in order to build gcc itself. So the libm (PML or other) can be 
> considered like a standard library, and built after GCC, outside of the 
> compiler build chain.
> 
> > True... but it isn't such nice after all ;-) I don't get that idea but 
> > it compiles all that m68020-60 etc stuff and then -- don't use it! When 
> > I ask gcc for multilib support without anything in t-mint, it says just 
> > 68000... why is m68020-60 etc compiled is really mystery for me...
> 
> Patrice Mandin has worked on that multilib stuff. Thanks to his 
> contribution, I fixed the regression about bad directory output for 
> 68000 libraries. Patrice also made a patch to enable 68020 compilation 
> without using the FPU. I haven't included it yet: we have to discuss 
> here of what set of multilibs need to be provided with our GCC distribution.

Well, we have these targets for Atari....

68030+68881/68882 (Falcon/TT)
68060 (Falcon/CT60)
68000 (STE/STFM)
68000+68881/68882 (MegaSTE)
68020 (ST accelerators) +68881/68882 ???? (not sure)
ColdFire?

Not sure if there are any other configurations.

Alan.