[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2

To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:58:54 +0200
In-reply-to: <1223214325.12833.2.camel@jetpack>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c6533ef60810041138n7dcd5968t474a68586f4582f2@mail.gmail.com> <48E7DEDA.2010907@freesbee.fr> <c6533ef60810041506x745742fbgbd772243d16cdd1a@mail.gmail.com> <48E8984B.7000603@freesbee.fr> <1223214325.12833.2.camel@jetpack>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Alan Hourihane wrote:

Well, we have these targets for Atari....

68030+68881/68882 (Falcon/TT)
68060 (Falcon/CT60)
68000 (STE/STFM)
68000+68881/68882 (MegaSTE)
68020 (ST accelerators) +68881/68882 ???? (not sure)
ColdFire?

Not sure if there are any other configurations.


Sorry for my lameness...
Is the FPU always optional ?
Is there some CPU where the FPU is always present ?

--
Vincent Rivière

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

References:
- [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: "Miro Kropacek" <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: "Miro Kropacek" <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread