[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] XaAES
on 7/23/09 5:20 PM, Kåre Andersen wrote:
>>
>> Is not 0x04 -> %100 ?
>> That's the bit for the system bell.
>>
>> I know it's used by the preproccessor but still the bit for bconin() would
>> be 0x08 -> %1000
>>
>> Have a look at some memory map for 'conterm'.
>
>
> Ah, now I see what you mean, and yes of course you are right... Still
> the code is not in effect (not compiled in), so it should not affect
> anything.
>
> Snooped a bit around in the kernel sources, but have not been able to
> locate the shift enabling bit anywhere else. Its probably there tho :)
>
> /Kåre
The thing is, when I exhaust all other means of documentation I go to the
CVS for help, hints and clues. I'm sure others do the same. ;o)
This is how I stumbled on it one day looking for info about the conterm
system variable. The thing is, even if it's not used, it should be
corrected or removed. My 2 cents.
The Compendium seems to indicate that bit is off by default, yet in plain
TOS and MiNT when it boots up it seems to be set on. This is why I was
looking into conterm, because I noticed GFA was fiddling with this bit and
flipping it on, when it's already on. Which I thought was strange.
--
Lonny Pursell http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/